It’s Okay To Prefer A Remake, Really

If it’s not a sequel, it’s a remake.

Ever the hot topic in film discussion, the phenomenon of film remakes is something many of us still can’t entirely wrap our heads around. It’s been going on for decades, to varying degrees of quality, but only in recent years become so commonplace. To the ire of large portions of the audience, big studios running low on ideas love little more than exploiting previously sold titles for guaranteed ticket sales.

Not that they have any excuses here. Films like Whiplash and Blue Ruin prove there are more than enough budding writers and directors out there just bursting with talent and originality, if only they were given the chance. Alas, it’s not that they’re running out of ideas, but rather know they have to put considerably less effort and money into selling a title that people already recognize. Even if it looks terrible, audiences will generally flock to see these movies, if for no other reason than morbid curiosity.

Horror has been hit the hardest, with practically every 70s and 80s slasher flick being reconstructed by a big Hollywood studio eager to wrap their fingers around the big bucks. Friday The 13th, A Nightmare On Elm Street, Halloween, Dawn Of The Dead, The Hills Have Eyes, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre – each and every one of them has been ‘re-imagined’ with a contemporary vision in one way or another, and then themselves gone on to spawn multiple sequels and remakes. As an audience member, it’s hard not to scrutinize every time it happens. I get that it’s a money business, but I mean, when there’s already a perfectly good film there waiting, why must we pay to sit and watch a soulless rehash made by some committee that clearly sat around a table and asked, “So what can we do to extort their money this time”?


Who cares if there’s a shinier version of Total Recall when the rest of it has 0% of the fun, flippancy and class of Paul Verhoeven’s original? I like Colin Farrell well enough, but he ain’t no Arnie – heaven forbid if they ever go near something like Die Hard (although Die Hard 5 is pretty much the worst thing that could have happened to the series anyway). It all becomes especially irksome when a film is put in front of us which blatantly has no heart; a film clear in the knowledge that all it’s doing is praying on the honest, hard-earned money of dedicated film lovers by splurging out inert, apathetic re-dos of pictures by filmmakers who once took so much pride in their work. I’m looking at you, The Haunting.

And yet, if you take a glance at the title of this article you’ll remember what I’m arguing here. This is only one side of the argument – the argument which is valid and compelling in many cases, but not always the answer. I’m a strong believer in objectivity (it’s what makes debating film so much fun), and here, as anywhere else, there must be a degree of open-mindedness; like the open-mindedness I felt when I realized I prefer the remake of The Amityville Horror to the original James Brolin/Margot Rodder version, or felt that 2002’s The Ring was every bit as creepy as Hideo Nakata’s original. In both cases I suppressed the urge to pretend otherwise because that’s what I was ‘supposed’ to think.

True, though, it’s not considered so controversial to enjoy a remake in some capacity. George A. Romero’s Dawn Of The Dead is one of the most revered horror classics out there, but it’s not uncommon to hear people praising Zack Snyder’s remake, which really is quite fun and fresh. Like a good cover of a song, rather than copying it note for note, it took the basic premise of Romero’s seminal zombie flick and developed it into a free-wheeling film with its own identity (on that note, is preferring a remake really so different to the widely accepted act of preferring a cover?). What you’re unlikely to hear, though, is someone asserting that Snyder’s Dawn Of The Dead is better than the original. Because we’re not allowed to prefer a remake of a great film, are we? Doesn’t that expose our true, uneducated colours?

maxresdefault (1)

Admittedly the line is somewhat blurred because in certain cases I’d be inclined to think the same (if you preferred Jan de Bont’s The Haunting over Robert Wise’s chilling masterpiece, for example, I’d think you’d been possessed by some horrific, tasteless demon), but the reality is there’s no reason we shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy an updated version as much if not more than its original, even if it can be hard accept sometimes. The bad eggs out there (Psycho, to add another) should die with fire, but who am I to criticise when I openly prefer at least two 00s remakes of highly revered classics (oh, who am I kidding, I love the Friday the 13th remake too). A lot of you out there who love the ’79 Amityville Horror will think I’m an absolute nutcase.

The point of this article (to me, at least) is not to sit atop some figurative high horse spouting off Gandhi-like wisdom and judgement. It’s some kind of an attempt to further demonstrate why film can be such a diverse, rewarding subject with room for everyone if we keep prejudice at bay an accept that we all have different opinions. For the same reason I wrote my defence of the jump scare recently, I find myself growing increasingly disillusioned with the levels of cynicism in today’s culture. That arrogant ‘I’m better than you, my opinion is worth more than yours’ attitude really gets to me, and while you could argue there are more important things to get upset about than people complaining about films, it is my one true passion and it upsets me to read so much vitriol and hate vomited at others for having a different opinion.

Hollywood certainly isn’t letting go of its current squeeze, anyway, so expect more of the good, the bad and, indeed, the ugly.


  • partidario April 16, 2016 at 6:28 pm:

    Another great argument, so eloquently put.

  • Citse April 17, 2016 at 10:56 am:

    Yes! Everyone thinks, “Nah, I prefer the original” is tantamount to being crowned wisest movie buff. So so so annoying, especially coming from people who don’t even take these things as seriously as some of us do. Great post!

    • Eddy Gardiner April 17, 2016 at 11:56 am:

      Thanks. It’s nice to know someone agrees!

  • Aarya April 25, 2016 at 5:49 pm:

    What an interesting post Eddy…it doesn’t matter which part of the world you belong to people are really finicky 🙂 Got hold of your blog from Community Pool…you got a very interesting blog on films…keep writing 🙂

  • brettfish May 2, 2016 at 5:48 pm:

    Nicely written – certainly something that will become even more of a thing as we see more and more remakes which have been specifically ramping up in the superhero genre of movies of late – Batman Begins is a classic example of best remake out there but i shudder with you at the thought of a Bruce Willis-less die hard…

    • Eddy Gardiner May 3, 2016 at 12:27 pm:

      I’m sure it would be dreadful. But then Bruce Willis barely looked like he wanted to be in Die Hard 5, so maybe it wouldn’t be so bad after all…


Leave a Reply