Revisiting: Interstellar (2014)

Contains spoilers

I’ve now had the chance to watch Interstellar four times since it landed in cinemas back in November 2014. I perhaps would have watched it more if it weren’t for the fact that this isn’t your average movie that you can just stick on one afternoon on a whim; it’s an event that requires the proper setting. Dark room, big screen, booming speakers. In any case, over the course of these viewings, I’ve come to realise something about the film which demonstrably wasn’t present during my initial reaction: it’s an honest to God masterpiece.

One of the beauties of film is its ability to yield completely different reactions, not only from different people, but from the same person who’s viewing it at a different time in their life or with a different mindset. It can sometimes be that a reaction to a film is clouded, however unintentionally, by variables like the general opinion at the time of release, or by expectations leading up to it – and one thing that Interstellar certainly wasn’t short of was expectation. I couldn’t count the number of times I saw a film at the cinema and didn’t think much of it, only to completely re-evaluate upon subsequent viewings. Chef springs to mind (I gave it 3 stars initially; now it’s one of my favourite movies), as does Drive. Thinking about how brilliant that film is, I still can’t believe I first walked out of it feeling ambivalent.

Yet perhaps, now, Interstellar is the most drastic case of my opinion changing. While it may not appear so, considering I went from unsure to head-over-heels in love with Drive, it’s the fact that I missed just how important Interstellar is to cinema that makes it a special case. It’s not just a great film; I feel like it will go down in history like Kubrick’s 2001 or Ridley Scott’s Alien. As a film that’s important and innovative to our time, to be studied and dissected by film classes in years to come. It’s no secret that it’s not universally appreciated yet, but I genuinely think Interstellar is one of the best films to come out in my lifetime.


It’s not only the sprawling, ambitious narrative or the messages it carries that make so special. Much of it is to do with the plain old surface…which, actually, isn’t so plain at all. Aided by a first collaboration with cinematographer Hoyte Van Hoytema, Nolan’s distinct visual design lends the film a gorgeous backdrop. Even the scenes set on Earth have a sort of grand, operatic look to them (those IMAX cameras have a way of doing that). But it’s in moments such as the Endurance travelling through a wormhole, as space warps around it and we’re consumed by an imitative optical illusion laced with Hans Zimmer’s grandiose, organ-inflected score, that the film really exploits the potential for visual stimulation – hence the reason for that aforementioned “proper” viewing environment. If you have that, it’s a beautiful, majestic assault on the senses.

But Interstellar does, of course, posses that ambitious narrative which carries with it an abundance of profound ideas. On one more conspicuous level, it’s about the Earth running out of food and a team of astronauts travelling into deep space to find potentially habitable worlds. On another, it’s a story about love’s ability to, as Anne Hathaway’s Dr. Brand puts it, transcend the dimensions of time and space – specifically, the love between a father and daughter who have been torn apart by both.


Cooper and Murph’s relationship is both joyous and devastating, and becomes the focal point for the film’s unexpected, abstract and profound third act. It’s hard to fully absorb and comprehend its implications after just one sitting (something which has sadly alienated many viewers), as Cooper finds himself in a 3D rendering of time constructed within a fifth dimension, yet a little examination shows that it all makes perfect, inspiring sense. What really becomes apparent is that we’re watching a film being vigorously ambitious. How many mainstream blockbusters do you see climaxing with a revelation about higher dimensions paving the way for us to communicate through time within our tangible three dimensions? Scrap that – how many space movies take an hour to get into space?

It’s so easy to forget, sometimes, the majesty that cinema has to offer. Films like Interstellar remind us. They inspire, reduce us to tears, reveal things about ourselves, while on a technical level, blow our minds. “This isn’t Nolan’s masterpiece, but while it may not yet be wholly understood, Interstellar is destined to go down as one of the great science fiction films of its time”. Well, I was at least partly right the first time – but this is Nolan’s masterpiece. A big, bold, beautiful masterpiece.


  • partidario March 25, 2016 at 9:28 am:

    Agree. It’s a masterpiece, not yet fully appreciated.

  • Kaitain Jones (@kaitainjones) March 26, 2016 at 4:58 pm:

    Fincher’s “Zodiac” is another such case for me: a movie whose masterpiece nature only became apparent after several viewings.

  • Benjamin Ngiam March 28, 2016 at 5:21 pm:

    I’ve haven’t seen the movie yet but definitely heard A LOT of praises being sung for this movie and hence am going to watch this some time soon. Just checked out your “Initial reaction” link and as said in there, was kinda sad that it wasn’t a video cause I thought it’d be fun to actually see your initial reaction to the plot twist during the movie lol.

    Anywho, kudos to the good reviews 😉

    Your friend,

  • hoppernomad May 3, 2016 at 4:41 pm:

    I didn’t love Interstellar. It’s been a while since I saw it, so I can’t remember exactly what I didn’t like about it. But after reading your entry here, I may give it another shot.

  • REVISITING: WESTWORLD (1973) - Lights Overhead October 8, 2016 at 2:44 pm:

    […] had gone way down from my initial impression way back when (a phenomenon about which I’ve written to some extent). Whether that diminished view of the film was down to having just watched the […]


Leave a Reply